RESEARCH & SCOPE
Key insights from Customer Satisfaction Surveys
The most frequent concern related to returns was from online shoppers who felt the lack of alternative return options for products purchased online. Customers, based on their experience with other retailers, wanted the convenience of a UPS drop-off or schedule a courier pickup to simplify the logistics of the return process.
I purchased my products online, but I still have to go to the store to return them. Why can't there be a more convenient return option, like other retailers offer
Needs and painpoints of customers, store associates and the business from interviews
Based on insights from competitor analysis of major retail players such as Lowe's, Ronas, Amazon, Best Buy, and Gap, we identified a common theme in the customer online returns process, which we were prepared to implement.
What order do you want to return? > What items do you want to return? > How do you want to return them? > Ready to submit?
Insights from Baymard literature
We used the following insights to help make some key decisions in our design thinking:
Instore returns are still an important return method - During testing 20% of the users preferred returning an item directly in store. Some benefits attached included avoiding shipping fees, getting a refund immediately, avoiding packaging, and immediately shopping for a replacement.
Cost of return is critical information - providing transparency on cost of returns benefits a user in completing their return decision. If additional fees apply, it helps to show the information upfront
Return methods - showing only one return method that turns out to be inconvenient to a user leaves a lasting impression on the site. When provided with options, 75% of the time customers tend to choose an option other than the default return method
Inconvenience of Shipping labels - most users do not immediately print their shipping label for return due to lack of access to printer. 67% of the test users would postpone printing the label to a later time which slowed down their return process.
Scope of Project with key features
1. Enable customers to initiate a return directly from the Orders page.
2. Display all eligible products for return with the option to select, while capturing return reasons for internal insights.
3. Introducing new, convenient return options such as Drop-off and Courier Pickup, while also offering the option for in-store returns
4. Display the total refund amount and any additional costs upfront, along with the expected refund timeframe
5. Provide packaging and return instructions for different return method, along with immediately emailing/viewing the return label.
6. Send return summary along with return label by email for customer reference
SPRINT 0 - CONCEPT SKETCHING
My design thinking approach to initiating returns online was as follows:
- Item-wise returns on an order: Drawing from competitors and Baymard literature, and adding to the existing experience on the order details page, I introduced an ‘return item’ call to action at item level to help a user easily decide on which item to return. This call to action will appear only for items that are eligible for return, and if they have been delivered or currently in transit.
- Introducing different Return Methods: With input from the product and business stakeholders, we introduced two additional return options: courier pickup and UPS drop-off. When returning an item, a pop-up modal appears to select the return method and charges. Since all returns are currently FREE, I emphasized this for the user and added features to locate eligible stores to assist in the decision-making.
- Customizing Courier Pickup: To enhance convenience and clarity for this return method, I included input fields for the user to specify the date and time frame. Additionally, I included a feature that allows users to request a label, addressing the common issue of limited printer access.
- Summarizing information: I consistently presented essential information for users' decisions, such as the refund total, selected return method, and return window. Upon confirming a return, a summary would be displayed, including instructions specific to the chosen return method.
Voted features:
After reviewing ideas and discussing benefits and risks, we voted on the following decisions for our online returns:
- Initiate a return from the order details page at order level considering ease of implementation
- Select specific products and quantities from the order to return.
- Select the return method, users needed to choose if they’d prefer to drop off at a courier location or schedule a courier pickup.
- Remind users that products could be returned to any Home Depot store and provide a map of all of the closest locations.
- Accommodate extra large items like patios, hot tubs or appliances. We needed to use a special courier that could arrange to pick it up. These couriers would contact the customer directly and needed the customers contact information.
- Accommodate customers who did not have printers to print our return labels. We added an option for users to have labels provided by the courier at pickup or drop off.
- Provide users with instructions and details about their return. Users needed to print and attach a label to a package they’ve prepared for the courier and know where to go to drop off or when the package would be picked up.
- Most importantly, users needed to know the refund amount and when they'd receive it
INSIGHTS FROM CONCEPT TESTING
We conducted unmoderated usability tests for users to independently interact with our prototype, assessing their ability to complete the return process without guidance. Users returned products from the order in the prototype, revealing preferences for either dropping items off at courier locations or having them picked up. We observed their attempts, noting roadblocks, pain points, and successful outcomes.
Key insights from our concept testing that will guide further development:
- Users acknowledged that the return process was intuitive and familiar to their experience with other retailers. They addressed that they saw all the information that was required to make a decision.
- Users were not always clear on how they should package their return, questioning if they needed to use the same packaging the item was received in, (which they did not) and if all of the printed return labels needed to be used (which they did).
- Users also wanted to know exactly when they would receive their refund. We were able to issue refunds as soon as the user the product was with the courier, a huge competitive advantage to be utilized.
.